top of page
Screen_Shot_2020-09-18_at_11.44.58_AM-re

How to Write a Video RFP That Gets Comparable Bids

PMG Staff Reports
2 hours ago
4 min read

A good video RFP does not ask every company to imagine a different project and then pretend the totals can be compared. It defines the outcome, audience, deliverables, constraints, and evaluation rules clearly enough that each bidder prices the same work and reveals how it thinks.

The best RFP also protects the buyer from a common trap: selecting the proposal that made the largest unstated assumption.

Start with the decision, not the equipment

Open with the communication problem:

  • What decision, behavior, or understanding should change?

  • Who is the primary audience, and where will they encounter the video?

  • What will success look like after release?

  • Why is the project happening now?

  • Who owns the project and who can approve creative, factual, and final decisions?

"Produce a three-minute video" is a task. "Help first-time attendees understand why the conference matters and register before the early deadline" is an assignment. Companies cannot price the second one responsibly without asking better questions, which is exactly what you want the RFP to expose.

Specify the deliverables as a matrix

Require every bidder to price the same list. Include:

  • Number and type of finished videos

  • Target lengths and aspect ratios

  • Captions, transcripts, and other accessibility deliverables

  • Social, presentation, broadcast, or learning-platform versions

  • Stills, graphics, animation, and source-file requirements

  • Music, stock, archival, and talent licensing

  • Masters, compressed files, project files, raw footage, and archive delivery

If optional items matter, ask for them as separate line items. Do not let one bidder bury them in the base price while another excludes them and appears cheaper.

State the production conditions honestly

Bidders need the facts that change the work:

  • Interview subjects and their availability

  • Locations and who secures them

  • Travel, security, parking, and building access

  • Existing scripts, footage, photographs, data, and brand assets

  • Required insurance, clearances, releases, and procurement rules

  • Known schedule risks and immovable dates

  • Languages, accessibility standards, and technical platforms

Do not hide a difficult approval chain or an impossible speaker schedule. A bidder who prices the fantasy will become expensive when reality arrives.

Give the schedule in milestones

List the dates that matter:

  • Proposal deadline and question deadline

  • Selection and contract date

  • Discovery and creative approval

  • Production window

  • Rough cut, revised cut, and final delivery

  • Launch or event date

Then ask each bidder to return a schedule with its own assumptions and staffing. The right company may tell you the requested sequence is unsafe. That warning can be more valuable than a cheerful promise.

Separate creative judgment from free spec work

You do not need every bidder to produce a finished creative treatment for free. You need evidence of judgment. Ask for:

  • Two complete projects for a similar audience or communication problem

  • A short explanation of what each project was hired to accomplish

  • The proposed approach to your problem, including what they would not do

  • The named producer, director, and editor, and their roles

  • References who can speak to schedule, revisions, and problem-solving

Judge how they think before you judge how a sample looks.

Require a pricing structure, not just a total

Ask bidders to separate:

  • Creative development and project management

  • Production days, crew, and equipment

  • Locations, talent, permits, and travel

  • Post-production, graphics, animation, and sound

  • Music, stock, and archival licensing

  • Captions and accessibility

  • Deliverable versions

  • Raw footage, project files, and archive options

  • Assumptions, exclusions, and likely overages

A total without a structure is difficult to evaluate and almost impossible to negotiate without damaging the work.

Put rights and revisions in the RFP

Ownership disputes are usually created before the contract. State what you expect and ask bidders to identify exceptions:

  • Who owns the finished videos?

  • Is raw footage included, priced separately, or unavailable?

  • Are editable project files included?

  • How long will the producer retain an archive?

  • What music, stock, voice, and talent rights are included, and for what term and territory?

  • How many review rounds are included?

  • Who consolidates stakeholder comments?

  • What counts as a revision, a new version, or a scope change?

Clear answers here prevent the most predictable conflict in the entire project.

Publish the evaluation criteria

Tell bidders what will decide the award. A useful weighting might consider relevant work, approach, named team, schedule confidence, completeness, and price. The exact percentages belong to your organization, but the principle does not: bidders should know whether they are being hired for the lowest acceptable price or the strongest defensible outcome.

That transparency also helps your internal reviewers. A selection becomes easier to explain when the RFP required evidence in the same categories used to score it.

Questions the RFP should force every bidder to answer

  • What do you understand our audience to need?

  • What is the largest risk in this project?

  • What would you change about our requested approach?

  • Who will attend the discovery meeting and the shoot?

  • What is not included in your price?

  • What information do you need from us, and when?

  • What will you deliver if the schedule compresses?

  • Can you show a complete project, not only a reel, that solved a similar problem?

A bidder's answers reveal whether you are hiring a production partner or renting equipment with a proposal attached.

What experienced buyers do differently

They hold a short second conversation before final proposals. They correct misunderstandings once, for every bidder. They do not award on a creative promise unsupported by staffing, schedule, or assumptions. And they leave room for a producer to identify a better route to the outcome.

Puritano Media Group has spent decades on both sides of this discipline: producing work for government, associations, nonprofits, education, and commercial clients, and reading the difference between a beautiful proposal and a producible one. Our training work for the U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Commercial Service, documentary work for the Army, and long-form podcast production for DiscoverE all began with the same requirement: define the audience and the deliverable before arguing about the picture.

The bottom line

Write the RFP so that honesty is visible. The company that names its assumptions, challenges the weak parts of the brief, and prices the whole job is giving you evidence. The company that returns the lowest number with the fewest definitions is asking you to finance its omissions later.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page